I've only used the free Gemini feature on Google, and in intensive questioning, it does very often get things wrong. I observe it seems to lack the quality of a good human scientist of demurring or remaining circumspect when there is insufficient evidence to justify an accurate conclusion. It does know enough to ask questions, but it is much more like a poor scientist, jumping to conclusions that haven't been properly tested. Its flaw seems to be that it is programmed to be helpful and eager to please. It is a product after all. I find it likable but over-enthusiastic and highly fallible.
I've only used the free Gemini feature on Google, and in intensive questioning, it does very often get things wrong. I observe it seems to lack the quality of a good human scientist of demurring or remaining circumspect when there is insufficient evidence to justify an accurate conclusion. It does know enough to ask questions, but it is much more like a poor scientist, jumping to conclusions that haven't been properly tested. Its flaw seems to be that it is programmed to be helpful and eager to please. It is a product after all. I find it likable but over-enthusiastic and highly fallible.